Middle East International magazine online - click for homepage
What's New?|About MEI|Who's Who?|Subscriptions|Get news by e-mail|For Webmasters|Links"|Contact

Advanced Search
News Content:Editorial|News Analysis|Features|News Analysis|News Analysis
Back Cover
Letter from Ramallah
From Graham Usher in Ramallah

November 4th, 2004 -- To see Arafat in Ramallah is to understand why dozens rather than thousands saw off the helicopter from the newly swept tarmac of his headquarters compound. That monument, the Muqaata, sprawls like an epitaph to their dream — an avalanche of fractured concrete where once flew the hope of a state. Arafat, too, exuded an aura of glories past. He was an icon still, wrapped in an army greatcoat and vowing to return (“in sha Allah”), but now of exhaustion as much as fortitude.

I last spoke with him a month ago. It was, said his aides, a lunch, not an interview, though questions were permitted. He sat down at the head of a long table covered in paper. The room was washed in an olive, airless light. There were no windows, only shadows.

How did he feel? “Well”, he said, biting into a chicken.

He looked old. Denied sunlight, his skin had the pallor of parchment. His lips trembled. What were alive were his eyes, magnified by glasses like the orbs of a jellyfish.

The same contrast was in his conversation. He answered questions about today and tomorrow perfunctorily, as though it was impossible to see beyond the horizon of his room. But he was stirred by the past, drawing sustenance from those vast pools behind the eyes. “It is like a prison. I’ve been here 41 months,” he continued, spooning corn from his plate on to mine. “I hope I will be able to leave soon.”

Did he exercise? “I can’t exercise. There are Israeli snipers on the three buildings opposite. If I were to go into Ramallah, an Israeli helicopter would assassinate me. Silvan Shalom [Israel’s foreign minister] said only today that Israel would like to kill me.”

Did he think Sharon’s decision to withdraw from Gaza offered some kind of opportunity? ”It’s not a withdrawal. It’s a military redeployment. Israel will still control the borders. It won’t allow the airport and port to be reopened”.

Did he think things might move after the US elections?.“Maybe, but I doubt whether Kerry will make any difference.”

Did he think there was any hope for a peace process? “Yes, but only if the Quartet acts to ensure implementation of the road-map. The road-map is not dead,” he said, with a swell of the eyes.

For many, Arafat blew his chance at the Camp David summit in July 2000. There, their argument goes, Ehud Barak offered the most generous deal any Israeli leader could make the Palestinians. Arafat said no. Worse, he made no counter offer. He dismisses the charge with a shaky hand. “Barak never made an offer at Camp David. It was Clinton, in December, who offered me 96/97% of the West Bank, plus land swaps of equal quantity and quality. And we were discussing that at Taba.”

So what happened at Camp David? “Barak wanted 89% of the land, minus military areas Israel wanted to keep in the West Bank. He wanted Israeli control over our borders, coastline and air space. But Barak’s most explosive mistake was to demand Israeli sovereignty under the Haram al-Sharif in Jerusalem. I took the proposal to the Islamic Conference’s Jerusalem Committee. I said, ‘If you accept this offer, I will accept it.’ Every one of the 16 countries refused.”

What about the right of return? “Israel didn’t talk about the refugees at Camp David. It was Clinton. I said to him: ‘What about the 320,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon?’ Clinton said there were only 180,000. I said, ‘let there be 100,000’. They must be allowed to return. There lives are miserable.”

He uncoiled a little, sagging back in his chair. He drank his soup from the lip of the bowl.

Did he make any mistakes? “No.”

Did he make any tactical mistakes? He peered through the steam of his soup. “No.”

What did he achieve? “We have made the Palestinian case the biggest problem in the world,” he said. “Look at The Hague ruling on the Wall: 130 countries supported us at the General Assembly; 107 years after the Basel Conference, 90 years after the Sykes-Picot agreement, Israel has failed to wipe us out. We are here, in Palestine, facing them. We are not Red Indians.”



Share this page: E-mail This  Print This

Top of Page | Back Cover Index
 
MEIONLINE.COM
Middle East International magazine has been a respected source for news, analysis , and commentary on the Middle East since 1971. [more].

RECENT HEADLINES

Editorial
Questions and answers
Hopeless in Gaza
Mubarak's day of reckoning
News Analysis
The yellow brick road-map
Sliding towards civil war
A new era for the Palestinians
Features
The evolution of Iran's nuclear programme
Protecting Europe's borders
A licence to kill
Back Cover
Letter from Gaza
Letter from Lausanne
Letter from Wadi Fukin
Electronic Archive
MEI Issue 761
MEI Issue 760
MEI Issue 759
About MEI
Introduction
Contact MEI
For Webmasters: Syndicate news from MEI!
Links
Afghanistan
Algeria
Bahrain




All content ©1971-2004 Middle East International.
Middle East International magazine, 1 Gough Square, London EC4A 3DE, UK.
Tel: +44-207-832-1330 | Fax:+44-207-832-1339 | E-mail


Website by nigelparry.net